• Contact Us

  • Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire: Ultimate Fan Guide

    Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire: The Ultimate Fan Guide [Kindle] $0.99.


    Kobo Inc.
    Download_on_the_iTunes_iBooks_Badge_US-UK_146x40_0824
    I
    Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire:  Ultimate Fan Guide

    Georgiana is the subject of the movie "The Duchess" (currently on Netflix) and a relative of the young Prince and Princess of Cambridge. Get the Ultimate Fan Guide -- with plot points, history, and what happened to the historical characters -- for only 99 cents!

  • Green Party Peace Sign Bumper Sticker


    Green Party Peace Sign Bumper Sticker
    The Green Party has continually opposed entry into war and has consistently called for the immediate return of our troops, in stark contrast to the Democratic and Republican parties.
    Today we march, tomorrow we vote Green Party.

  • Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened?

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? ebook cover

    |

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? eBook

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? eBook on Amazon

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? eBook

    Reflections on Occupy Wall Street, with photos, fun, and good wishes for the future. eBook, Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? (Only $.99 !) In the eBook, the Occupy movement is explored through original reporting, photographs, cartoons, poetry, essays, and reviews.The collection of essays and blog posts records the unfolding of Occupy into the culture from September 2011 to the present.  Authors Kimberly Wilder and Ian Wilder were early supporters of Occupy, using their internet platforms to communicate the changes being created by the American Autumn.

    The eBook is currently available on Amazon for Kindle;  Barnes & Noble Nook ; Smashwords independent eBook seller; and a Kobo for 99 cents and anyone can read it using their Kindle/Nook Reader, smart phone, or computer.

Diebold voting machines: recount needed in New Hampshire?

From the web-site: Legitgov

http://www.legitgov.org/nh_machine_vs_paper.html

Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results By Lori Price
09 Jan 2008

2008 New Hampshire Democratic Primary Results

Total Democratic Votes: 287,580
Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008

Hillary Clinton – Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 40.121%
Hillary Clinton – Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.703%

Barack Obama – Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 35.756%
Barack Obama – Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 38.785%

Machine vs Hand:
Clinton: 5.419% (15,584 votes)
Obama: -3.029% (-8,711 votes)

The difference between results from hand-counting and machine-counting do not necessarily signify that the machine-counting is wrong. Other factors may be involved. For example, voting machines may have been used in wealthier, more moderate neighborhoods. There may not be a causal connection between machine-counted ballots and differing totals. One cannot assume that machines are necessarily wrong while hand-counting is necessarily right. –Michael Rectenwald


Wild speculation and musings from Kimberly: What I find the most interesting about this, is to speculate about “if” it were true that someone messed with the results of the Diebold machines in New Hampshire to favor Hillary Clinton over Obama, then who would it have been and why?

So, what follows is all just silliness, but, it makes you think…Diebold has conflicts because it is connected to Republicans in some way…so why would anyone at Diebold want to make Hillary Clinton win over Obama?

Could it be because the Republicans want Clinton to be their opponent in the regular race (they think they can beat her)?; or could it be because the Republicans were afraid if Obama won, he would become president and be a progressive president?; or it could be because someone among the Republicans, or at the Diebold company itself wanted Obama to lose simply because they don’t want an African-American candidate out front?; or, could it be that we only just assume that because the Republican-influenced vote machine company stole the election for Bush, that that means the Democrats didn’t “like or agree” to that outcome?–maybe someone in the Democrats is in cahoots with the Republicans who steal elections? (In fact, Gore did not fight the 2000 election results enough, and Kerry barely challenged the 2004 results at all. (The Libertarians and Greens cared more about a re-count.)

Maybe it is all such a charade and the most powerful Dems and Reps in the shadow government choose the outcome of every election? This is all horrible speculation and conspiracy imaginings. But, I just wanted to think it out…why might something like this happen?

More importantly, regular people and electoral activists should realize the importance of poll-watching. And, also, someone should make sure that there are “exit polls” held in 2008, that are run by various independent media and researchers. Those kind of projects should be considered now: poll-watching programs and exit polling.

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.