• Contact Us

  • Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire: Ultimate Fan Guide

    Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire: The Ultimate Fan Guide [Kindle] $0.99.


    Kobo Inc.
    Download_on_the_iTunes_iBooks_Badge_US-UK_146x40_0824
    I
    Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire:  Ultimate Fan Guide

    Georgiana is the subject of the movie "The Duchess" (currently on Netflix) and a relative of the young Prince and Princess of Cambridge. Get the Ultimate Fan Guide -- with plot points, history, and what happened to the historical characters -- for only 99 cents!

  • Green Party Peace Sign Bumper Sticker


    Green Party Peace Sign Bumper Sticker
    The Green Party has continually opposed entry into war and has consistently called for the immediate return of our troops, in stark contrast to the Democratic and Republican parties.
    Today we march, tomorrow we vote Green Party.

  • Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened?

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? ebook cover

    |

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? eBook

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? eBook on Amazon

    Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? eBook

    Reflections on Occupy Wall Street, with photos, fun, and good wishes for the future. eBook, Occupy Wall Street: What Just Happened? (Only $.99 !) In the eBook, the Occupy movement is explored through original reporting, photographs, cartoons, poetry, essays, and reviews.The collection of essays and blog posts records the unfolding of Occupy into the culture from September 2011 to the present.  Authors Kimberly Wilder and Ian Wilder were early supporters of Occupy, using their internet platforms to communicate the changes being created by the American Autumn.

    The eBook is currently available on Amazon for Kindle;  Barnes & Noble Nook ; Smashwords independent eBook seller; and a Kobo for 99 cents and anyone can read it using their Kindle/Nook Reader, smart phone, or computer.

A Multipartisan Contest: Who does Dem. Senate Leader John Sampson mean by “we”?

The Wilderside’s “We Want More Than Bipartisanship Contest”

Political blogger Elizabeth Benjamin caught a great line from an editorial that NY State Senate Majority Leader John Sampson (D) wrote: “Bipartisanship is the only tool that will help fix New York’s problems.”

Bipartisanship. Harumph. Why is the word “bipartisanship” such a pet peeve of mine? Because, I am a third party activist. And, I am someone who also values the right of independent citizens to run for office. So, it galls me that someone would use a word that pretends to stand for some kind of “unity” and “all-inclusiveness”, when the word actually stands for the two most powerful groups teaming-up against everyone else and smothering the political process. I do not call that “bipartisanship.” I call it the gentleman’s agreement that keeps powerful people in power, and keeps ordinary citizens out of the smoke-filled back room, and out of any meaningful input into the political process.Jay Jacobs, who was then only a Nassau County Democratic leader, but is now, Chair of the New York State Democratic Committee, once said on the radio, “The Republicans are my second favorite party.” That kind of bipartisanship is a tool to suppress third party and independent voices. (And, we note that it was not so effective for Jay Jacobs, who was part of the crushing loss of Democratic Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi to a Republican.)

Bipartisanship. On its face, it means friendship and cooperation among two parties: The Democrats and the Republicans. Those two parties are the duopoly who march us to war and injustice.

What is needed, instead, is discussion, media attention, election law, and ballot access rights at the service of everyone, regardless of their party affiliation. What is needed is at least multipartisanship — with the understanding that citizens who choose absolute independence are included in that model.

The Times Union published the bipartisanship quote above, in an opinion piece by State Senator John L. Sampson. State Senator Sampson discusses why he is appointing Republicans to the chairs of certain committees. He praises the effectiveness and accomplishments of bipartisanship, and goes on to say: “…And just imagine what we can do by working together.”

Your mission: describe who State Senator Sampson means by “we”. Please put your thoughts in the comment section* to participate in our “We Want More Than Bipartisanship Contest”. Your prize will be delighting the third party community, and being at the top of the post we will write to summarize the results.

On the surface, State Senator Sampson’s “we” means to stand simply for all the members of the NY State Senate. But, couldn’t his “we” also refer to all of the incumbent elected officials in Albany who have Albany wrapped up in their flag of slush funds and self-importance?

Please share your thoughts. But, let’s play this like Jeopardy. Your answer only counts if, at the top, you put in quotation marks the exact words you mean for “we”. After that, you can write any explanations.

Good luck and have fun.

A recent video at the Times Union might give you some visual inspiration about the folks in New York State government:

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid33238197001?bctid=58113311001

__________________________________________________________

*Note, that we have some spam filters on our blog based on previous ad hits, etc. So, your comment, even if perfectly reasonable, may take a few hours and moderation to go through.

8 Responses

  1. Sample Contest Entry:

    We may mean “All of the incumbent elected officials in Albany who have Albany wrapped up in their flag of slush funds and self-importance”

    -KW

  2. We means “not me.” :)

  3. […] Senator Sampson means by “we”. Please put your thoughts in the comment section [of the onthewilderside post] to participate in our “We Want More Than Bipartisanship Contest”. Your prize will be […]

  4. The same “We” that voted for the Iraq war, Afghanistan war, the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, and the Bank Bailout.

  5. “We” are the political alchemists of the duopoly system of government and the two-party state, who, by means of the sacred mysteries of their order – ritual incantations in smoke-filled rooms – discursively transmute their narrow, particularist interests into the universal instance of the public good.

    • To D. Eris:

      Whoa! That’s good…(errr…I mean, that “we” is a bad one…)
      ;)

      Many thanks,
      Kimberly

      • Thanks Kimberly. But, oh no! I put the quotation marks on the ‘we’ instead of around the definition, i.e. from “the . . . [to] . . . good.” How hard and fast are those Jeopardy rules? ;-)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.